What Does Employment Discrimination Look Like?

 In an ideal world, your professional success will be determined by the quality of your work. In the real world, however, other factors also intervene. Do you believe prejudice has harmed your ability to reach your professional objectives? Discrimination is a real issue but proving it can be difficult. To fight back against this injustice and get equal compensation, you'll need more than suspicion; you'll need the help of an Employment Attorney.

Find A Labor Lawyer for Employment Discrimination Claims in California

Discrimination on the basis of race, sex, pregnancy, childbirth, and medical conditions related to pregnancy and childbirth, age (40 and up), ancestry, color, religious creed (including religious dress and grooming practices), denial of FMLA leave, disability, marital status, and medical condition (cancer and genetic characteristics) is prohibited under California fair employment laws.

As a result, there is a chance of engaging in prohibited discriminatory treatment in a variety of workplace settings, including:

• Both internal and external recruitment
• Interviewing/selecting applicants for work and applying for jobs.
• Pre-employment testing.
• Background investigation.
• Recruiting.
• Compensation.
• Benefits.
• Employee services or perquisites (also known as perks).
• Conditions of employment.
• Appearance and attire.
• Take a break from administration.
• Disciplinary acts or other forms of retaliation in the workplace.
• Promotion, relocation, or demotion are all options.
• Judicial rights are being exercised.
• Downsizing, layoffs, or a reduction in force.
• Employer's termination and post-termination conduct.

Harassment in the Workplace

Harassment happens when an employer, boss, supervisor, or coworker (sometimes even a customer) says or does something that makes a person's sex, race, or other personal characteristics intimidating, threatening, or aggressive at work.

The sex or race of an employee is a common source of abuse. When an employee is forced to participate in sexual activity or is regularly subjected to inappropriate sexual comments, jokes, or images at work, it is considered illegal sexual harassment. If an employee is humiliated by racial epithets, prejudices, or images, it is considered illegal racial discrimination. Harassment at work also causes victims great emotional distress and embarrassment.

Anti-discrimination laws and protected classes

The California Fair Jobs and Housing Act (FEHA) is the main piece of legislation that protects workers from workplace discrimination. Employers with five or more full-time or part-time workers are subject to all FEHA job requirements. The majority of comparable federal laws only apply to businesses with at least 15 workers. As a result, California anti-discrimination laws apply to even more employers than federal anti-discrimination laws. (It's worth noting that the FEHA anti-harassment statute only extends to employers who have one or more employees.) See Federal Labor Laws by Employee Count.

While the California FEHA applies many of the same nondiscrimination rules as the federal legislation, the state laws shield more groups from discrimination in terms and conditions of employment. Employers are subject to California law when it is more protective of workers than a similar federal law.

Discrimination Against People with Disabilities

Disability discrimination is the most prevalent form of workplace discrimination in today's world. California's employment law could have been violated if your employer fired you because you're disabled. Discrimination laws not only make it illegal to fire anyone for having a disability, but they also require employers to offer equal accommodations to workers who request them. These laws are extremely strict, and businesses all over the state routinely break them.

At the most fundamental level, California law states that a company cannot dismiss a disabled person who can perform the job's essential functions. Companies are often forbidden from dismissing a disabled employee who is unable to perform critical functions but can do so if suitable accommodation is provided. The California Equal Employment and Housing Act (12940(a).

Employees in California are afforded more rights under the FEHA than they are under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"). The FEHA provides greater security to California residents, extends to smaller employers, and the concept of disability is not as narrow. The FEHA is even more effective than Title VII, which imposes loss limits on verdicts against disabled employees. This is yet another example of how California goes above and beyond to support its low-wage workers.

What Does California's Employment Law Define as a "Disability"?

This is a difficult issue to respond to. Physical disorders, mental disabilities, and medical conditions are all classified as "disabilities" under California's disability discrimination statute.

Any physiological illness, impairment, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss that affects certain body systems and restricts an individual's ability to engage in significant life activities is referred to as a physical disability. Limits "major life events," which means it makes it more difficult to complete a major life operation.

Chronic or episodic disorders such as HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, epilepsy, seizures, diabetes, heart disease, and multiple sclerosis are included in this definition. Other physical limitations, such as polio, back conditions, hypertension, broken bones, surgery, and pregnancy-related disabilities, can qualify as a disability. Pain does not constitute a disability until it prevents you from doing something important in your life. If your disability isn't mentioned here, contact an Employment Law Attorney for advice.

A mental disability is defined as any mental or psychological condition that "blocks a major life function," such as intellectual disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, or particular learning disabilities. Clinical depression, bipolar disorder, mental illness, various learning disabilities, autism spectrum disorders, schizophrenia, and chronic or episodic problems like post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder are among the conditions covered.

A medical condition can be described as one of the following:

• health problems caused by or linked to a cancer diagnosis or a history of cancer
• features of genetics
• Individuals with mutations or inherited traits linked to an elevated risk of illness are referred to as impaired.

What do you mean by "reasonable accommodations"?

When an employee is injured and unable to perform the job, he or she may be able to perform the job with minor adjustments. This is what is referred to as fair accommodation. It is illegal for an employer to "fail to make fair accommodations for an employee's identified physical or mental disability." Companies are not required to accommodate workers if doing so would "impose an unnecessary hardship on the corporation's operations."

These accommodations must be requested by employees. If an organization is unaware of your needs, it would be unable to satisfy you. This brings up another critical aspect of disability discrimination law: retaliation for seeking accommodation is illegal. If the boss requests a doctor's note, they are within their rights to do so.

What is the Interactive Method, and how does it work?

Employers are not only forbidden from dismissing disabled employees and are obliged to accommodate disabled staff, but they must also collaborate with the employee to find suitable accommodation. The "interactive process" is defined in detail in CA Government Code 12940. (n). An employer who fails to participate in a prompt, good faith, interactive procedure with an employee to assess effective fair accommodations (if any) in response to a request for reasonable accommodation by a qualified employee is engaging in unconstitutional employment practice.

Discrimination based on sex

The "old boys club" is still alive and well in certain workplaces. Glass ceilings exist, and women all over California are feeling the effects. If you were fired because you protested about workplace inequity, don't hesitate to contact us for a free consultation.

It is well recognized that California law forbids businesses from refusing to employ, compensate, encourage, or fire anyone solely because of their gender, gender orientation, or gender speech. The California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA"), Section 12940, contains this provision (a).

Employees in California are afforded more rights under FEHA than they are under federal Title VII sex-based discrimination protections. Aside from the increased rights, CA law offers two distinct and powerful benefits:

1. In California state court, a plaintiff would not require a unanimous jury decision as in federal court.
2. In contrast to Title VII, the FEHA allows for unlimited compensatory and punitive damages.
3. This legislation intersects with California's wrongful termination statute. Termination for reasons of gender or sex is against the law.

Discrimination based on age

Younger management workers could not recognize the importance of experience. Terminating an employee because of his or her age is illegal. Simply put, California law prohibits businesses from refusing to employ or fire anyone based on their age. The California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA") contains this provision.

Despite this regulation, there are a number of work activities that do not constitute an illegal employment practice in and of themselves. This involves internal promotions, hiring or advancement based on experience and training, rehiring based on seniority and previous service with the employer, or hiring from high schools, colleges, and universities through a proven recruitment program. You must prove that age was a driving factor in the failure to recruit in order to demonstrate that these acts are illegal.

Employees in California are afforded more rights under FEHA than they are under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), but one bright line that both laws share is that the worker must be over the age of 40. Due to the lack of constitutional limitations on prizes, the FEHA is also more strong than the ADEA. This is only one reason why California is regarded as one of, if not the most, worker-friendly states in the country.

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of the United States vs. the Fair Employment and Housing Act of California

As previously mentioned, the FEHA provides workers with greater rights than the ADEA, but there are some cases where they overlap. The following are some examples:

A minimum of 20 full-time or daily part-time employees is required by the ADEA. The FEHA, on the other hand, is only applicable to businesses with five or more workers.

Plaintiffs favor the FEHA because it provides for damages that the ADEA does not, such as emotional distress and punitive damages. In addition, there is no constitutional cap to the amount of money that can be awarded.

The ADEA, on the other hand, could be favored by highly compensated claimants due to the possibility of liquidated (double) damages.

The FEHA empowers individuals to speak out against policies that disproportionately harm people over the age of 40. The term for this is "disparate effect theory." According to the ADEA, an employer is not liable if the procedure or policy is based on rational factors other than age.

The ADEA does not accept remarks that are unrelated to the topic at hand and are deemed irrelevant. According to the FEHA, such comments may be used in conjunction with other facts to prove that a biased atmosphere exists and that a trial is warranted.

Employees over the age of 40 are eligible for severance packages.

To amend the ADEA, the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA) was passed in 1990. One of the improvements it introduced was strengthening the safeguards for workers over the age of 40 who were given severance packages, which usually require the waiver of the employee's right to file a lawsuit under the ADEA/FEHA. The severance package must meet the following criteria in order to be deemed "valid":

• Be clear and concise in your writing;
• Make a specific reference to ADEA rights or statements.
• Not to relinquish any potential demands or rights;
• To be traded for anything of value (compensation, medical treatment, etc. );
• In writing, advise the person to seek legal advice before agreeing;
• Allow the person 21 days to accept the agreement before signing it and at least seven days to revoke it after signing it.

Discrimination based on race

It is well recognized that California law forbids employers from dismissing employees solely because of their ethnicity or skin color (including against one's own race or color). This involves hiring anyone solely on the basis of their race or color. The California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA") 12940 contains this rule (a).

Employees in California are afforded more rights under FEHA than they are under federal Title VII. For example, FEHA refers to businesses with five or more employees, while Title VII only applies to businesses with fifteen or more employees. Furthermore, unlike Title VII, FEHA does not set a limit on damages.

Race vs. Color

Many people confuse race and color, but they are two distinct concepts. Despite the fact that color discrimination charges are uncommon, they may serve as the basis for a complaint against one's own race, as in Walker v. Secretary of Treasury, I.R.S. A supervisor with darker skin discriminated against a lighter-skinned African-American employee in that situation.

In the eyes of the law, race refers to groups of people whose ancestry or racial characteristics can identify. It's worth noting that discrimination cases for Native Americans based on tribal membership may be filed as ethnic or national origin claims.

Discrimination based on religion

Not only do some employers fail to meet workers' religious demands (such as not operating on the Sabbath if you're Jewish), but some companies outright dismiss employees who don't share management's religious beliefs. It makes no difference whether you are a Christian, Muslim, Jew, Buddhist, or atheist. If you've been fired because of your religion (or lack thereof), you should seek legal advice.

The right to freedom of religion is one of the most fundamental liberties we have in this country, and CA takes it very seriously. Corporations are not allowed to refuse to recruit or fire anyone because of their religious convictions (or lack thereof if atheist). The California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA") 12940 is the name of the statute (a).

Employees in California are afforded more rights than those afforded under federal law, Title VII. In California, you do not need a majority jury decision as in federal court, and the FEHA does not set a limit on gross damages.

Religious Fair Accommodations

When an employee's religious values conflict with a work requirement, it may be difficult to find a solution. Some religions, for example, forbid working on the Sabbath. Religious discrimination laws in California require employers to make fair exceptions for religiously motivated workers. After the employee tells the employer of his or her religious beliefs and restrictions, the employer is obligated to look into any fair accommodations that may be available for that employee. Religious accommodations are usually approved when the following conditions are met:

• The employee is kept in their current job, but the working conditions are changed.
• By allowing the employee to move to another similar job where religious differences are less likely to occur.
• Exempting the individual from duties that are incompatible with their beliefs.
• allowing certain tasks to be completed at a later time or by a different individual

So, in the case of a sabbath or Sunday ban, the accommodation may be that the employer decides not to schedule the religious employee on Sunday but instead allows them to work on Saturday. To prevent a religious discrimination case, the employer must demonstrate that measures were taken to respect the employee's beliefs.

Religious Organizations are exempt from the law.

The FEHA covers most workers in California. However, if you work for a religious organization or a non-profit, the FEHA's rights are unlikely to extend to you. In terms of the FEHA, non-profit religious organizations and companies are not considered "employers." 1st This means that a university-affiliated with a Christian church, for example, may refuse to hire a Buddhist or Muslim. Religious organizations that operate open-to-the-public healthcare services, on the other hand, are not permitted to discriminate against workers that do not perform religious duties.

Disparate Treatment and Impact

Disparate treatment. When an employer considers an employee's protected status when taking an adverse employment action, such as a termination or layoff decision, it is known as disparate treatment discrimination. An employer who knows of an employee's pregnancy and, at least in part because of that information, chooses the pregnant employee for layoff over a less-qualified employee who is not pregnant is an example of deliberate discrimination.

Disparate impact. When an employer adopts a policy or procedure that appears neutral and nondiscriminatory on the surface but has a disproportionately negative impact on members of a protected class, it is known as disparate impact discrimination. The following practices have been found to have a differential effect on protected groups:

• Requirements for minimum height Women, Hispanics, and Asians have been shown to be disproportionately affected.
• Physical agility tests are conducted. Women can be disproportionately affected by these factors.

Once the differential effect has been identified, the employer must show that the challenged provision is job-related for the position in question and compatible with business needs in court. If the employee shows a less discriminatory way to meet the company's needs, the employer can be forced to use it.

Retaliation

Retaliation against an employee who has exercised can exercise or is considered to have exercised rights under the law in question is also prohibited under the California FEHA.

Employers can find it much more difficult to defeat retaliation litigation than direct discrimination lawsuits. When performing administrative terminations or layoffs involving workers who have engaged in protected practices, employers must be careful not to try, or appear to try, to "get even."

Managing Risk and Preventing Violations

Fair employment law breaches can be systematic, and adherence to fair employment standards can be incorporated into the cultural fabric as well. Employers may take a variety of steps to avoid unfair labor practices and allegations of discrimination, including:

• Adopting a company ideology regards workers as people who deserve dignity and equal care rather than goods.
• Creating consistent written policies and procedures that truly represent the employer's equal opportunity principles, then sticking to them and documenting human resource decisions thoroughly.
• In new-employee onboarding and preparation, emphasizing the employer's fair workplace values, strategies, and procedures.
• Continuing to educate employees about the company's fair workplace values, practices, and procedures. Creating a fully open-door equal employment dispute resolution mechanism.
• Designating and motivating a responsible person to deal with fair workplace problems, such as an ethics officer, EEO officer, affirmative action officer, diversity officer, ombudsman, or human resources chief.
• Consistently and systematically investigating employee grievances.
• Employers control their equal job risk in addition to the measures outlined above by:
• Grievance processes, mediation, and arbitration are examples of internal dispute resolution programs.
• Liability protection is used by the employer.
• Release of allegations as part of a severance pay package or ad-hoc equal work dispute settlement.
• Equal jobs problems are being managed on an ongoing basis.

Compliance

Most state governments have one or more Fair Employment Practice Agencies, which are civil rights policy equivalents of the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The Department of Fair Jobs and Housing (DFEH) in California is responsible for enforcing laws that protect workers from illegal discrimination and abuse in the workplace.

Employees or others who believe their EEO rights have been violated can file a Charge of Discrimination form with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. A Charge of Discrimination is a sworn statement filed with the DFEH that explains in broad terms why the charging party claims his or her EEO rights have been violated. Based on an interview with the charging party, the DFEH will assist the charging party in preparing this form. If the charging party has legal counsel, the Charge of Discrimination is often followed by a more extensive sworn statement or affidavit.

The DFEH would inform the employer or other party being charged—the respondent—of the charging party's allegations and request a written response to the allegations as well as copies of relevant documents such as procedures, performance reviews, and evidence of any disciplinary actions. In certain cases, the investigation agency may also want to know about the composition of the workforce.

In the event of a FEHA complaint, an employer must perform a timely, reasonable, and comprehensive investigation and take effective corrective action.

The agency usually offers to assist the parties in reaching a negotiated settlement before or after the respondent submits its response to the charge of discrimination and agency request for information. The agency investigator may encourage conciliation; in other cases, the agency may have an experienced mediator and facilities for the parties to meet and reach a settlement acceptable to all parties.

After a comprehensive review, the agency will decide whether there is probable cause to conclude the respondent violated the charging party's FEHA rights if the parties do not consent to a negotiated settlement.

The right to sue

The Fair Employment and Housing Council (FEHC) is usually given the first chance to solve the issue (i.e., a charging party cannot bypass the agency and immediately file a lawsuit). The agency will inform the charging party in a so-called right-to-sue letter after it has completed its investigation and issued its charge decision that he or she will now proceed to file a complaint if desired. The letter also specifies how long the charging party has to respond, which is usually 90 days.

The issuance of a right-to-sue letter begins the clock for an aggrieved party to file a lawsuit with an effective court of law under the laws enforced by the FEHC. Normally, this procedure necessitates hiring a Los Angeles Employment Lawyer on a contingency fee basis. However, in some cases, the department will bring suit on behalf of the charging party, supplying the employee with expert government-paid legal counsel. The following factors play a role in the council's decision to file a lawsuit on behalf of an employee:

1. The number of workers who have been affected (especially if a class action).
2. The suspected violation's nature.
3. The agency's ability to address unanswered legal questions or further the public interest by focusing on those high-priority fields or industries.

In a discrimination lawsuit, what will you get?

• Economic Losses

• Economic penalties are available if you win at trial. In other words, you will be compensated for the wages you would or should have received if you hadn't been discriminated against. If you were fired unfairly because of your age, race, or gender, you would regain the amount of money you would have gained if you hadn't been fired.

• Damages Caused by Emotional Distress

• The "pain and suffering" caused by prejudice are included in these damages. Anxiety, depression, duress, crippling stress, and emotional suffering are all covered by ED damages. In a religious discrimination situation, for example, the employee might be paid damages for weight loss, having experienced insomnia, diarrhea, emotional spells, severe depression, and the loss of their enjoyment of life. The law attempts to compensate for both past and potential emotional distress.

• Lawyer Fees

• One of the most important parts of FEHA discrimination lawsuits is the right to recover attorney's fees in addition to other damages. Since several discrimination lawsuits have insufficient economic and emotional distress damages, California's legislature agreed to incentivize Employment Lawyers to keep a check on employment discrimination.

• Punitive Damages

• These fines are meant to punish a corporation for acting irresponsibly. These types of damages are rare and are limited by Supreme Court rulings in the United States. To win punitive damages, you must show that the employer acted with intimidation, deception, or motive. This is an especially challenging attribute to attain.

Statute of Limitations

A right to sue letter from the Department of Fair Employment and Housing must be obtained within one year of the discrimination act (usually a termination, demotion, or failure to hire). You have one year to file your case in court from the date you received the letter. This right-to-sue letter is usually obtained by your counsel on your behalf.

Employees in public institutions have a different statute of limitations. The statute of limitations can be as limited as six months in certain cases! Since the statute of limitations in discrimination cases varies, you can meet with a California Employment Lawyer as soon as possible after the discriminatory incident.

What If You Were Fired for Filing A Complaint?

The employer's motivation for firing the employee was a breach of public policy, which is a factual aspect of a wrongful termination charge. The best way to describe what makes up public policy is to provide an example. The following examples are based on case law or legislation.

• The employee was fired for speaking out against workplace discrimination and abuse.
• Since the employer was trying to delay paying him his earned wages, the employee was fired.
• The employee was fired because she took advantage of her right to overtime pay.
• For complaining about poor working conditions, the employee was fired.
• The employee was fired after complaining about threats of physical abuse from coworkers.
• The employee is fired because he or she took unpaid family or medical leave.
• Jury service has resulted in the employee's dismissal.
• Due to a subpoena, the employee was fired for taking time off to appear in court as a witness or testify in a deposition.
• The employee was fired in retaliation for reporting to a government agency an employer's breach of state or federal regulations.
• For reporting the sum of his or her salary to coworkers, the employee is fired.
• For sharing details about the employer's working conditions, the employee is fired.

There are far more public policies that come under the broad umbrella of "wrongful termination" than those mentioned above. You can consult a Labor Law Attorney to see if you have a case. To determine if California's employment laws were broken, the Employment Law Attorney may ask you why you were fired. Consider one of our prescreened California Lawyers in your Cal Bar Attorney Search.

Statute of Limitations for Wrongful Termination Claims

Wrongful termination proceedings are subject to the two-year statute of limitations set out in the California Code of Civil Procedure 335.1. This cause of action occurs at the time of dismissal, not when the employee was notified of the termination. However, there are several causes of action in some employment situations, each with its own statute of limitations. As a result, waiting too long to contact an Employment Law Attorney is not a good idea.

Find A Workplace Discrimination Lawyer in Los Angeles

1000Attorneys.com is a California Bar Association Certified Free Attorney Referral Service that can Match you with a Los Angeles Employment Attorney that's the best fit to handle your case. Contact us through our 24/7 Live Chat (or complete our case details submission form) for a free online review.