Your Guide to California Wrongful Death Claims

You may be entitled to compensation under California state law if you have lost a loved one and have been left in financial distress as a result, in addition to the emotional pain of grief. In a wrongful death action, you can recover damages if it can be proven that your loved one died as a result of the negligence or careless actions, or omissions of others. Winning a wrongful death lawsuit has several complexities and possible roadblocks, but an accomplished California attorney would know how to maneuver around or around them to get you the payable damages you deserve.

Find A Wrongful Death Attorney After The Death of a Loved One

The first thing to remember in a wrongful death case is that it is a civil, not a criminal, proceeding. In a criminal case, punishments such as incarceration, fines, the deprivation of the right to own a weapon, and even execution are all possible. However, in a civil suit, the plaintiff's sole goal is to be compensated for real damages incurred by the negligence or wrongdoing of another individual or corporation.

Another distinction between civil and criminal litigation is that criminal cases are usually brought by the state against a defendant, while civil cases are pursued by the person who has sustained a loss or an heir acting on his or her behalf.

You may file a personal injury claim if you are hurt or experience financial or non-economic damages (pain and suffering) as a result of another's wrongful conduct. However, if the injured party dies, it is up to those who survive him or her to file the lawsuit in his or her name. An individual entrusted with the deceased's assets, on the other hand, may file the suit.

The Fundamentals of a Wrongful Death Case

If an individual or agency (the defendant) is criminally liable for the untimely and wrongful death of a person (the decedent) as a result of negligence, recklessness, or a deliberate act, they can be held liable. You may sue the person liable in civil court as a relative of the defendant (the plaintiff).

Part 377.60 of the California Code of Civil Procedure expressly states that the plaintiff has the right to file such a claim and demand monetary compensation known as damages. To present a successful case and ensure the maximum possible amount of damages, the plaintiff must employ a personal injury attorney. How the attorney plans to arrange the case would be determined by the specifics of the situation. It's also worth noting that as the plaintiff in a civil case, you have the burden of proof to justify the claims you're making, namely, that another person's conduct and/or negligence caused your loved one's death.

Who Is Qualified To File A Wrongful Death Claim?

A wrongful death case can be filed by the decedent's family and loved ones. According to California law (CCP 377.60), the following people will file a lawsuit:

• The decedent's surviving spouses.
• Section 297 of the California Family Code lists the decedent's registered domestic partners (b).
• Any of the decedent's legal children, including biological and adopted children.
• If the decedent's children are no longer alive, the case will be brought by the decedent's grandchildren.
• Any other minor dependents, including stepchildren, who received at least half of their financial support from the decedent.
• Any other heirs of the decedent as specified by California's intestate succession laws.
• Any of the above's legal representatives.

Please keep in mind that intestate succession occurs when a person dies without leaving a valid and/or executable will that names their heirs specifically. In these cases, the state of California intervenes and efficiently distributes the property and properties according to a legally recognized heirs scheme. In other words, if a person dies without a will, the state will write one for them.

The statute of limitations for juveniles who want to file a case is longer. They have two (2) years from the time they reach the legal age to file a lawsuit; in other words, they have two (2) years from the time they turn 18 to file a wrongful death charge.

In addition, the majority of wrongful death cases are followed by survival cause of action lawsuits. Subsection 377.30 of the California Code of Civil Procedure codifies this. They are similar to wrongful death lawsuits, with the exception that the plaintiff in these cases is the decedent's estate. The estate is essentially filing a case on behalf of the decedent; the decedent's right to sue whoever wronged them "survives" their death.

In most cases, wrongful death and survival action lawsuits are filed together and complement each other in civil court. Since the types of possible damages differ slightly in each lawsuit, a personal injury lawyer may advise you about the best way to pursue both.

What Are the Different Types of Wrongful Death Claims?

For a variety of reasons, a plaintiff can file a wrongful death lawsuit. The following are the most common:

• Accident involving a motor vehicle.

• This involves cases in which a person is struck by a careless or inebriated driver, in which the damages will be more serious due to the defendant's greater culpability.

• A pedestrian is involved in a traffic accident.

• Pedestrian knockdowns happen when a driver hits a pedestrian with their vehicle, either deliberately or unintentionally. The damages would be even higher if the driver engaged in "serious or outrageous behavior."

• It's a case of premises liability.

• This happens when someone in charge of a particular space is careless, resulting in hazardous conditions. For example, "slip and fall" incidents in which the decedent falls in a store or private building fall into this category.

• Malpractice in the medical sector.

• This happens when a doctor or clinician fails in their professional duties to care for a patient and acts in such a way that the patient dies prematurely, normally due to simple negligence.

• Drowning in a public or private pool.

• When children are left unattended, or there is no lifeguard on duty to restrict liability, this happens often. The defendant would be a municipal body if it was a city pool. If the defendant is a hotel pool, another private company will be the defendant.

• Neglect and/or violence.

• When someone, normally a caregiver, fails to perform their professional duties while caring for an elderly person or a child, this happens. If the wrongful death was caused by assault, they would face more legal consequences than if it was caused by mere negligence.

• Attack and/or battery

• This is an example of the defendant's deliberate conduct resulting in the death of the decedent. The defendant did not want to destroy the decedent, but they did act in such a way that physical harm was likely to occur.

• Manslaughter and/or murder are also possible charges.

• This is the most severe type of wrongful death, and it occurs when the defendant acts with such carelessness, gross negligence, recklessness, or intentionality that they cause someone else's death.

What's important to remember is that the amount of damages increases in direct proportion to the defendant's degree of culpability. To put it another way, the more careless, reckless, or intentional the defendant's conduct was, the more they were held liable. A drunk driver who is not only inebriated but also driving recklessly will face double punishment for their behavior.

In a wrongful death lawsuit, what does the plaintiff have to prove?

In a wrongful death case, the plaintiff and their legal team must demonstrate three main factors:

The defendant owed the decedent a civil obligation known as the duty of care. A defendant's duty of care is a legally enforceable responsibility that requires him or her to make a reasonable effort not to hurt or injure others.

• The defendant was negligent in his duty of treatment.
• The defendant's negligence was a significant factor in the wrongful death (this is legally known as causation).

As a result, almost every wrongful death lawsuit revolves around how the defendant's negligence resulted in the adverse circumstances that injured or killed the decedent. The breach of the duty of care due to negligence, on the other hand, is the bare minimum that must be defined. If the defendant acts in a more egregiously risky way, such as recklessness or willful conduct, the Wrongful Death Lawyer will attempt to claim that behavior as causation, and you may be paid more damages.

It's critical to create a wrongful death case around the defendant's actions and wrongdoing. To guarantee that you obtain the most favorable amount of damages, the personal injury attorney will strive to increase the defendant's level of blame. The most common cause is negligence, but it is important for your counsel to show how the negligence caused the adverse conditions.

What is the Difference Between Ordinary and Gross Negligence?

Your counsel would not need to show that the defendant acted with criminal intent in order to prove that negligence was the causative factor. For example, in most criminal cases, the prosecutor must develop this principle in order to secure a conviction. In civil cases of negligence, however, the counsel just needs to show that the defendant showed a pattern of conduct or a lack of care in circumstances where these characteristics are reasonably anticipated. As previously noted, the duty of care is this rational assumption.

As a result, the legal concept of negligence under California civil laws is when the defendant fails to act in a responsible manner to avoid the decedent's damages. Ordinary negligence is another term for this. Negligent behavior may take the form of both action and inaction. To put it another way, legal negligence is defined as when the defendant does or fails to do anything that a reasonable person would do.

Gross negligence is a type of negligence that is more extreme. It is, however, less severe than the legal concept of irresponsibility. Where the defendant shows no care and behaves in a manner that is well beyond the bounds of fair conduct, this is referred to as gross negligence. As all negligent conduct falls on a continuum of some kind, this is a legal term that is subject to interpretation. As a result, the Wrongful Death Lawyer would need to create a strong argument based on the defendant's conduct, responses, and motives to show that gross negligence existed rather than ordinary negligence.

Intentional Action and Recklessness

Ordinary negligence is the lowest degree of responsibility for breaching the duty of care legal provision, followed by gross negligence, recklessness, and eventually malicious conduct. To establish higher standards of responsibility, the counsel would most likely need to show that the defendant engaged in reckless and unsafe conduct on a regular basis.

This may be accomplished by conducting a private inquiry, which may include the use of a private investigator, to determine the circumstances and specifics of the defendant's actions or misconduct. If the cause of death of the decedent is unclear, an independent autopsy and/or investigation may be required to begin the process of pursuing a wrongful death lawsuit. Furthermore, expert witnesses and evidence are often required in order to establish that the defendant's duty of care was breached when your loved one died.

• If the Wrongful Death Lawyer wants to show that the defendant acted recklessly, they'll have to show that the defendant was aware that the chance of damage was "highly likely." Furthermore, they displayed shortsighted and ultimately risky conduct or a lack of care and foresight, and they were well conscious that they were ignoring the significant risks associated with their actions.
• If the defendant caused the wrongful death by deliberate acts, the counsel would need to show that they did so knowing it would hurt someone else. It's likely that the defendant had no idea that his actions would result in the death of the decedent. If they did act with that knowledge, grave criminal charges like involuntary manslaughter or manslaughter would be pressed by the district attorney. However, in these circumstances, the civil proceedings are separate from the criminal trial, and the defendant may still owe you damages.

Demonstrating Liability

Plaintiffs can only claim damages as compensation for wrongful death if they can show that the death was caused by the defendant's malicious intentions or negligence. Apart from gathering sufficient facts and questioning witnesses, the affected family members must still file wrongful death proceedings before the statutory deadline expires. Regardless of the suffering you are experiencing as a result of the loss, and it is important that you take the required legal steps to ensure that all involved parties receive the maximum compensation possible. The four key elements of wrongful death as described by the statute are as follows:

• Negligence.

• This feature allows the remaining wrongful death victims or their attorneys to show that the defendant's Breach of Duty led to their loved one's death by recklessness, neglectful actions, or carelessness. In order to win a wrongful death lawsuit, the plaintiff must also show that the Respondent owed the decedent a duty to care for his or her well-being. Essentially, the plaintiff must show that this obligation existed and that it was violated as a result of the negligence.

• Causation.

• Aside from demonstrating how the obligation was violated, the complainant must also show how the offender's negligence resulted in the death of their loved one.

• Damages.

• There must be some quantifiable losses incurred before and after a person dies, such as medical expenses, hospital bills, funeral costs, loss of security, and other benefits. Proof that the damages were caused by the breach is required.

Damages that a wrongful death claimant will be able to recover

Losing someone you care for due to someone else's irresponsible or neglectful actions can be a truly uncontrollable experience that can cause serious harm to the entire family. Aside from the emotional difficulties brought on by this misfortune, you are likely to face financial difficulties as well. In such cases, you have the right to file a wrongful death lawsuit to recover both monetary and non-monetary damages.

The Different Kinds of Damages

In a wrongful death claim, damages can be paid for both "real" and "non-economic" damages (also known as "compensatory damages"). They are meant to compensate descendants of the deceased for the lost value of assistance they would have earned from the decedent had they not died. It is important that the complainant hires legal counsel to ensure that they receive the maximum amount of compensation possible.

These losses can only be recovered after a certain amount of time. That is either the decedent's estimated life expectancy at the time of the wrongful death or the plaintiff's estimated life expectancy at the time of the wrongful contract, whatever is shorter. The length of this life expectancy would be decided by a civil court jury. The presiding judge will order them to consider all of the different contributing factors, such as the decedent's or plaintiff's lifestyle, health, and/or occupation.

Furthermore, when it comes to the number of damages that the plaintiff can claim, California law is a little hazy. The CCP 377.60 simply notes that claimants will be entitled to recover "only" damages depending on the facts of the wrongful death case. As a consequence, the range of possible damages is extremely wide. As a result, you should have a professional legal team handle any aspect of your wrongful death case, improving your odds of winning a large settlement.

What Exactly Are Economic Losses?

The most basic form of compensatory damages that can be sought in a wrongful death case is economic damages. Damages for objective and verifiable injuries are included. This indicates that they can be measured based on the plaintiff's losses. "Special damages" is another term for them.

• Medical bills (if the decedent did not die right away), financial support that has been lost due to the wrongful death, burial and funeral bills, and services in the household that the decedent may have provided, and the loss of property, benefits, and/or gifts that heirs may have received are the most common types of economic damages, without limitation and for past, present, or future scenarios.
• Economic damages are determined based on the plaintiff's expected losses. If there are multiple charges, such as hospital and funeral home bills, they must be totaled and addressed at trial. It is important for the plaintiff to keep track of all costs related to wrongful death. When the jury finds in favor of the plaintiff, the economic loss will be factored into the total amount of damages that the defendant must pay.

It's worth noting that only "fair" expenditures will be taken into account. If the plaintiff throws an extravagant memorial service or clearly wastes money on non-essentials, only a portion of those expenses can be reimbursed in the final sum of damages. Again, California law leaves a lot of room for interpretation when it comes to the definition of "fair expenditures."

Future financial assistance that has been lost due to wrongful death, on the other hand, is much more difficult to quantify. In these situations, it is a common procedure for the legal team to retain the services of an economic expert who can estimate the financial damages that will result from the decedent's death in the future. These sums will be presented at trial, and the jury will factor them into the total amount of damages that the defendant must pay.

What Are Non-Economic Damages and How Do They Affect You?

Non-economic damages differ from economic damages in that they are injuries that are not quantifiable. As a result, the damages awarded to the plaintiffs are arbitrary and difficult to verify. The procedure for measuring non-economic damages is much more complicated than that for calculating economic damages, and it entails the presiding judge instructing the jurors to rely on their common sense. They're also known as "common damages."

Plaintiffs are paid general damages to compensate for the loss of the worth of the decedent's existence. Companionship, sexual relations, intimacy, care, warmth, security, affection, moral support, and/or assistance of the decedent are all examples of lost value. There are intangible values that cannot be measured on a scale that is objective (unlike lost wages, for example). The California Code of Civil Procedure, on the other hand, stipulates that the plaintiff's loss of these intangibles is crippling and that they are entitled to compensation for their loss.

As a result, legal precedent sets the upper limit on the number of general damages that can be paid. This implies that there is no numerical limit to the size of the number. It's more or less determined based on what similar cases in the past have yielded in terms of results. Furthermore, if there is proof of substantial general damages in a wrongful death lawsuit, but the final verdict is too poor, California law provides for a fresh trial to obtain sufficient general damages. Consider one of our prescreened California Lawyers in your Cal Bar Attorney Search.

Damages You May Not Be Able to Claim

Punitive damages are the third type of damages, and they are used to deter future careless, reckless, or malicious conduct that may have caused harm or injury. In personal injury situations, they are essentially used as a form of deterrence to ensure that the same tragedy does not occur again. Punitive damages, on the other hand, are not eligible in wrongful death proceedings.

In addition, California law prohibits the decedent's heirs from seeking damages for pain, sorrow, regret, and/or suffering as part of the total general damages sum. In comparison to other personal injury lawsuits that did not result in wrongful death, this one did.

Furthermore, medical costs damages may only be awarded during the time span between the fatal accident and the time of death. To put it another way, medical attention had to be limited to the injury that caused the wrongful death. Hospital costs incurred prior to the fatal accident, such as for pre-existing medical conditions, are not included in the final damages calculation.

The Sum of Damages and the Culpability of the Defendant

It's important to remember that the amount of damages is proportional to the defendant's level of negligence or recklessness. This means that the larger the damages, the more culpable the defendant is. As a result, a personal injury attorney is required to handle the case in order to ascertain the defendant's level of culpability. Negligence is to blame for the majority of wrongful deaths. There are, however, various degrees of negligence, and California law distinguishes between "negligence" (also known as "ordinary negligence") and "gross negligence."

1. Ordinary negligence is described by California law as acts that do not meet the reasonable standard of care required of a fair and sane individual. An individual may be found guilty of criminal negligence if they fail to act within the parameters of what would be considered an acceptable response given a set of circumstances. This negligence encompasses both action and inaction, as well as the failure to respond to a specific set of circumstances. In other words, California law establishes tacit guidelines about how a reasonable and sane person can behave in a variety of circumstances.
2. Gross negligence, on the other hand, arises when the defendant disregards this degree of fair care or consideration voluntarily, willfully, and/or consciously. It simply means that any rational person will expect the defendant's conduct to cause substantial harm and/or damage to persons or property.
3. The definition of "malice" in a defendant's conduct is also expressly defined by California law. Malice is described as the deliberate intent to commit an illegal act that will almost inevitably result in serious injury, harm, or death to another person, without any justifiable excuse or purpose (such as self-defense). It is significantly more severe than either ordinary or gross negligence.

The sum of damages increases exponentially with each degree of culpability under California's wrongful death laws. To put it another way, if a criminal behaved maliciously, the amount would be higher than if they acted negligently. The sum would be higher if they acted with gross negligence than if they acted with ordinary negligence. As a result, building your court case around the defendant's intentions, and hence his degree of culpability is critical to obtaining a significant amount of damages.

What is the Statute of Limitations?

A statute of limitations is found in all California statutes. This means the defendant only has a certain amount of time to file a lawsuit in order to recover punitive and/or compensatory damages. The actual statute of limitations, on the other hand, is determined by the legal principle on which the case is based and the form of wrongdoing that resulted in the death.

The general rule is that a wrongful death lawsuit has a two-year statute of limitations, which means the family has two years from the date of death to file a lawsuit. Section 335.1 of the California Code of Civil Procedure expressly states this. The main statute of limitations is often referred to as this.

It should be remembered that the time limit can be as limited as one (1) year in some situations. The statute of limitations in such cases can be three (3) years. This is applicable in cases of medical malpractice, according to California Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5. This occurs when a health care provider's decisions result in the death of a loved one. CCP 340.5, on the other hand, notes that the family has one (1) year from the date that the harm may have been discovered to file a claim.

This means that the statute of limitations' operation is entirely dependent on the facts of the case. Working with a legal professional is important because the information can easily become daunting. It is best to move forward with your case as soon as possible by consulting a law firm.

An applicant can still bring a complaint after the statute of limitations has passed, but they risk the defendant's legal team filing a motion to dismiss the case. This is referred to as an untimely accusation in legal terms. A prosecutor, on the other hand, would rarely dismiss an untimely allegation on their own. In most cases, they do so in response to the defendant filing a Motion to Dismiss or asserting an affirmative defense. This form of defense specifically tells the judge that the case was filed too soon and should be dismissed. However, whether or not the judge agrees to do so is determined by the facts of the case and the claims made by your counsel.

When Does the Limitation Period Begin?

The length of the statute of limitations varies greatly depending on the facts of the wrongful death case. There are also a number of factors that influence when the statute of limitations begins to run. This is referred to as the accrual of the statute of limitations in legal terms (or when the statute of limitations begins running).

It usually starts on the date of the damage. However, in a wrongful death situation, this leaves a lot of room for legal interpretation. The date of damage would be the date of death if the defendant's and/or neglect resulted in a single incident that killed the decedent.

When a wrongful death is the result of a series of acts and/or negligence over a long period of time, the claimant's legal team must determine when the pattern of harmful conduct started. They'd still have to figure out when the damage and/or death occurred (this is known as the date of discovery). It refers to the precise moment that the complainant or decedent learned of the harm and/or death (prior to their death). It's also possible to suggest that the date of discovery coincides with the date on which the decedent could have discovered the harm that caused their death.

It may be appropriate to perform an independent investigation in such circumstances. This may include questioning a number of people who are connected to the case. If an individual or company wants to restrict their legal responsibility and refuses to cooperate with an independent investigation, it might be appropriate to employ a private investigator to collect additional information. This is normally achieved by the law firm that represents the defendant, and it can provide useful evidence.

The amount of damages is proportionate to the defendant's extent of fault or intervention. This means that the damages would be more serious if the complainant and their legal team can create a pervasive and long-term pattern of conduct and/or negligence.

Find A Wrongful Death Attorney in California

Have you recently lost a loved one due to someone else's negligence? 1000Attorneys.com is a California Bar Association Certified Free Attorney Referral Service that can put you in contact with a Wrongful Death Lawyer to handle your case.

For a free initial case review, you can reach us through our 24/7 Live Chat (or complete our case details submission form).